Skip to content

Burger King Trio price: $8.00, and $2.00 for the third item

$2.00 is what the third item costs when a $6.00 Duo becomes an $8.00 Trio.

The Burger King Trio price was recorded at $8.00 on both readings taken in August 2026, or $2.67 an item. Set against the $6.00 Duo, the third item costs exactly $2.00, which is below anything a Burger King sandwich was recorded at on its own. Nothing else in the value section is that cheap per item, and no calorie figure exists for the box.

Burger King guides — surveys, menus and gift cards · Burger King value-menu prices, every item compared · Burger King menu prices across every list checked

What you need

5 items
Burger King published priceNone published
Calories, company figureCould not be read
Typical price$8.00
Menu sectionvalue-menu
Checked on2026-08-19

Trio (3 for $8) price and calories

ItemTypical pricePrice rangeCalories
Trio (3 for $8)$8.00
Prices recorded from published US listings on 19 August 2026; Burger King's last published nutrition figures date from November 2022 and contain no row for this bundle.

If something goes wrong

Should I take the Trio or the Duo?

Cause
It depends on the third item alone. Both bundles were recorded at fixed prices, $6.00 and $8.00, so the extra slot costs $2.00 regardless of what goes in it.
Fix
Take the Trio whenever the third item would have cost more than $2.00 bought singly, which on the recorded figures means almost always.

Is $8.00 the price everywhere?

Cause
Both readings taken in August 2026 gave $8.00 with no variation, which is unusual on this menu. It is still an advertised construct rather than a published price, since Burger King issues no US price list.
Fix
Check the deals tab in the app for your restaurant. A named-price bundle is honoured at franchisee discretion, and nothing obliges a board to match it.

Which items count towards the Trio?

Cause
No readable list exists. The company's menu pages render in the browser rather than as text, and neither price reading captured the qualifying selection.
Fix
Read the selection off the board or the app rather than any list, including this one. Only the $8.00 could be confirmed twice.

What the third item actually costs

Two bundles, two fixed prices, and one useful subtraction. A Duo was recorded at $6.00 and a Trio at $8.00, both twice, with no disagreement in either case. The difference between them is $2.00, and that is the marginal cost of a third item at Burger King.

Hold that against the singles. The cheapest standalone sandwich price recorded anywhere in August 2026 was $2.29, shared by a Chicken Jr. and a Rodeo Burger. Nothing on the menu was found below it. So the third slot in a Trio buys a sandwich for less than any sandwich was recorded costing on its own, which makes it the single best-value position in the whole value section.

What's in it

Three items from a selection the company has not published in any readable form. Its menu renders in the browser rather than as text, and neither price reading recorded a qualifying list, so the contents cannot be set out here with any authority. The $8.00 can be, twice over.

Calories are absent for the same reason they are absent from every row in this section. The most recent nutrition figures Burger King has published are dated 2022, bundles are assembled from choices rather than fixed, and the figures found during checking contradicted each other badly enough to be worthless. An empty cell is the honest output.

Is it worth it

Per item the Trio is $2.67 against the Duo's $3.00, so the larger bundle is the better rate by 33 cents an item. That much is arithmetic. Whether either beats buying separately still depends on the picks: three Royal Crispy Wraps at their recorded $3.49 would cost $10.47 alone, so the Trio saves $2.47, while three Chicken Jr. at $2.29 come to $6.87 and beat the bundle by $1.13.

The pattern is the same as the Duo's, shifted down. Cheap picks lose, expensive picks win, and the break-even sits at $2.67 rather than $3.00. What changes is the margin for error: because the third item effectively costs $2.00 and almost nothing was recorded below that, the Trio is harder to get wrong than the smaller bundle.

One caution closes it. Both figures behind this row are advertised prices rather than published ones. Burger King issues no US price list, so a bundle named after its own price is the closest thing to a company statement that exists, and even that is honoured restaurant by restaurant.

Trio (3 for $8) at a glance

Burger King price
not published
Typical price
$8.00

Questions people ask

How much is the Burger King Trio?

$8.00, on both readings taken in August 2026, which is $2.67 an item. The two readings agreed exactly, which is uncommon on a menu where nothing is published.

How much does the third item cost in a Trio?

$2.00, being the gap between the $6.00 Duo and the $8.00 Trio. No Burger King sandwich was recorded below $2.29 sold on its own, so the third slot is the cheapest item position on the menu.

Is the Trio better value than the Duo?

Per item, yes, by 33 cents. Against buying separately it depends: three Royal Crispy Wraps at $3.49 would cost $10.47, but three Chicken Jr. at $2.29 come to $6.87 and beat the bundle.

How many calories are in the Trio?

No company figure exists. The last nutrition document Burger King published is dated 2022 and covers no bundles, and the counts found during checking were too inconsistent to print.

Is this page an official Burger King price list?

No. HelpMeLogin is independent of Burger King and answers to nobody else. Both readings behind the $8.00 were recorded on 19 August 2026.

Can this site tell me the price at my local Burger King?

No. Named-price bundles are advertised nationally and honoured locally. Open the Burger King app, choose your restaurant and check the deals tab before ordering.

HelpMeLogin is independent and has no affiliation with Burger King or Restaurant Brands International. The $8.00 above was recorded on 19 August 2026 and is not a quote for any address. Burger King has published no calorie figure for this bundle.